You can often tell that a series converges or diverges by comparing it to a known series. I'll look first at situations where you can establish an inequality between the terms of two series.
Let
,
, be series with positive terms.
It's easy to see that these tests make sense. In the first case, the
partial sums of
are
bounded above by
. The
partial sums increase, so they must converge.
In the second case, the
partial sums are always bigger than the
partial sums, but the
partial sums go to
. Hence, the
partial sums go to
as well.
Example. Determine whether
converges
or diverges.
The series has positive terms. In fact, I could use the Integral
Test, but who would want to integrate
?
Instead, note that when k is large, the
term should dominate.
How does
compare to
? Well, if
you make the bottom smaller, the fraction gets
bigger:
Now
is a p-series
with
, so it converges. Hence,
converges by comparison.
Example. Determine whether
converges or diverges.
The series has positive terms. Since
,
The second inequality comes from the fact that making the bottom smaller makes the fraction bigger.
Now
is a p-series
with
, so it converges. Hence,
converges by comparison.
Example. Determine whether
converges
or diverges.
The series has positive terms. Since
,
converges,
because it's a p-series with
. Therefore,
converges
by direct comparison.
Example. Determine whether
converges or diverges.
If you make the top smaller, the fraction gets smaller:
Notice how I avoided changing
to k; I changed it to something
which cancelled the radical on the bottom.
Now
diverges --- it's
harmonic! So
diverges, by comparison.
Example. Comparison won't work if the
inequalities go the wrong way. For example, consider
. I'd like to
compare this to
, but if I make the bottom bigger (by adding 2), the
fraction gets smaller:
It's true that
is a convergent p-series (
), but it's smaller than
the given series. I can't draw a conclusion this way.
Nevertheless,
is "close to" the given series in some sense. Limit Comparison will make precise the idea that
one series is "close to" another, without having to worry
about inequalities.
Let
be a positive term series.
Let
be a positive term series
whose behavior is known. (You usually choose this series because it
seems to be "close to" the given series.)
Look at the limiting ratio
The first case is the most important one, and fortunately it will
work even if you accidentally write
instead
of
. The second and third cases require that
you get the fraction "right side up".
Example. Determine whether
converges
or diverges.
The series has positive terms.
When k is large, the top and bottom are dominated by the terms with the biggest powers:
Compute the limiting ratio:
The limiting ratio is 1, a finite positive number. The series
diverges, because it is harmonic. Hence, the series
diverges by
Limit Comparison.
Example. Determine whether
converges or
diverges.
The series has positive terms.
When k is large,
Compute the limiting ratio:
The limiting ratio is 1, a finite positive number. The series
is a convergent geometric series (since
).
Therefore,
converges, by Limit Comparison.
Example. Determine whether
converges or diverges.
It is possible to use Limit Comparison, comparing the series
to the convergent geometric series
. After a long computation, you'll
find the limiting ratio is
, so the test works.
However, there is a better way, which I'll discuss next. It is called
the Root Test, and you perform it by taking
the
root of the
term, then taking the limit
as
. If the limit is less than 1, the series converges.
In this case,
Therefore, the series converges, by the Root Test.
Send comments about this page to: bikenaga@marauder.millersville.edu.
Last updated: December 2, 2005
Millersville University Home Page
Copyright 2005 by Bruce Ikenaga