The area under a curve can be approximated by adding up the areas of rectangles.
Example. Approximate the area under
from
to
using 20 equal subintervals and
evaluating the function at the left-hand endpoints.
You can use a calculator to approximate this sum; it's around
0.84799.
Example. Note that the subintervals don't
have to be the same size, and I don't have to choose the evaluation
points systematically. These are both conveniences for the problems.
For example, here is an approximation to the area under
from
to
.
This gives an approximate area of 51.84. The actual area is 77.
In general, suppose I'm trying to find the area under
from
to
. I break the interval
up into n subintervals of lengths
,
, ...,
. In the k-th subinterval, I pick
some point
, and use
as the height of the k-th
rectangle.
The sum of the areas of the rectangles approximates the area under the curve:
The more rectangles I take, the better the approximation. So it's reasonable to suppose that the exact area would be given by the limit of such sums, as n goes to infinity:
The expression on the right --- a limit of a sum, or a Riemann sum --- is called the
definite integral of
from a to b and is denoted as follows:
It is possible to compute areas using the formula above, though it's not easy.
Example. Use the limit of a sum to compute
the area under
from
to
.
I will need the following summation formulas:
Divide up the interval
into n equal subintervals. Each has length
. I'll evaluate the function at the
left-hand endpoints. These are
The k-th point is
, so the height of the k-th
rectangle is
I get the following expression for the area:
Apply the formulas from the beginning of the problem:
While this approach works, it's horrendously complicated. I'll discuss better ways to compute definite integrals shortly.
Since I'm taking a limit in computing the definite integral, it's
possible for the limit (and hence, the definite integral) to be
undefined.
is integrable on the interval
if
is defined.
The following fact says that many of the functions you'll use in
calculus are integrable:
(A function on an interval
is
bounded if there is a number M such that
for all x in
the interval.)
For example,
is integrable on any interval.
In particular, a continuous function is integrable.
On the other hand,
is not integrable
on any interval containing 0.
In some cases, you can use the fact that the definite integral represents the area under a curve to evaluate the integral geometrically.
Example. Compute
.
Example. Compute
.
The area consists of the piece in the last problem, together with a piece of area 2. But the second piece is below the x-axis, so it is taken as negative in the definite integral:
Example. Compute
.
This is half the area of a circle of radius 1:
Here are some properties of definite integrals. I'll present them without proofs.
1. If k is a number, then
This is another way of saying that the area of a rectangle is the base times the height.
Example.
2. If f and g are integrable, then so is
, and
This says that the integral of a sum is the sum of the integrals.
3. If f and g are integrable and
for
, then
This says that bigger functions have bigger integrals.
Example. You can use the last rule to get estimates for integrals.
For example,
Therefore,
4. If f is integrable, then
That is, switching the limits of integration multiplies the integral by -1.
5. If f is integrable on the interval
and
, then
That is, integrating from a to b and then from b to c is the same as integrating all the way from a to c:
Example.
6. ( The Mean Value Theorem for Integrals)
There is a number c,
, such that
represents the height of a rectangle on the integral
which has the same area as the area under the graph
of
.
Example.
for some c between 0 and 2.
Now
Therefore,
So
I've gotten a rough estimate for the value of the integral.
Send comments about this page to: bikenaga@marauder.millersville.edu.
Last updated: December 2, 2005
Millersville University Home Page
Copyright 2005 by Bruce Ikenaga