Roughly speaking, an integral
is improper if:
For example,
are improper because they have infinite limits of integration.
are improper because the integrands become infinite on the intervals of integration.
Improper integrals can be reduced to four cases:
You can reduce integrals with more than one "bad thing" going to the cases above by breaking them up into pieces. For example,
The original integral has two infinite limits. I pick a point at random (in this case, 0), and break the integral up there. I now have two improper integrals, each with one infinite limit. They fall into the first two cases above.
Likewise,
In the original integral, the function
blows up in the middle of the interval of
integration. I break the integral up at 1, and the two integrals that
result fall into the third and fourth cases.
Because I can break more complicated integrals up in these ways, I just have to say what to do in the four cases above.
In the case of an infinite limit, define
If the limit on the right side exists, the integral converges, and the value of the integral is the value of the limit. Otherwise, the integral diverges.
The case where the integrand does not have a limit at one of the
endpoints of the integration interval are similar. For example,
suppose that
is undefined. Define
Likewise, if
is undefined, define
As in the infinite case, if the limit on the right side exists, the integral converges, and the value of the integral is the value of the limit. Otherwise, the integral diverges.
Example. Compute
.
Replace the infinite limit with a parameter c, then take the limit as
:
The integral represents the area under the graph of
from
to
.
The area is
. A region that has infinite extent can have finite
area.
Example. Compute
.
When both limits are infinite, divide the integral up into two pieces:
The choice of
as the dividing point is arbitrary --- any
number will do.
Next, compute each of the integrals. If either integral is
undefined, the original integral is undefined. The is true even
if one piece approaches
while the other approaches
--- you can't "cancel the infinities".
First,
This is enough to make the original integral undefined --- that is, the integral diverges. I'll compute the second piece anyway:
I again emphasize that you can't cancel the
from the first
piece with the
from the second piece.
The first integral represents the area under the curve to the right
of
. It is positive, and infinite. The second integral
represents the (signed) area above the curve to the left of
.
Since the curve lies below the x-axis for
, the integral is
negative and infinite.
Example. Compute
.
The integrand
is undefined at
,
which is the left endpoint of the interval of integration. Replace 0
with a parameter a, and take the (right-hand) limit as
:
Notice that
has a vertical asymptote at
:
Example. Compute
.
The integrand
is defined at
,
which lies in the middle of the interval of integration. Break the
integral up into two pieces at
, and compute each piece
separately. As in the example above, if one piece diverges, the
original integral diverges.
The first integral is
I could stop here --- the original integral diverges --- but I'll grind out the second integral anyway.
Note that (as in the earlier example) if one piece approaches
and the other approaches
, you're not allowed to
"cancel the infinities".
Example. Compute
.
This integral is improper for two reasons:
First, I need to break the integral up into two pieces at
:
In the second integral, the lower limit
makes the integrand
undefined and the upper limit is infinite. Thus, I need to break the
second integral up into two pieces. I can choose any point between 5
and
as the break point; I'll use
.
Next, I'll compute the three integrals. Note that
\newpage
First,
(Note that
since the even power "2"
eliminates the minus sign.)
Next,
Finally,
The first two integrals converged, but the third diverged to
.
Therefore,
Example. Show that
converges.
In some cases, you can tell whether an improper integral converges or diverges by comparing it to another integral.
The antiderivative
can't be computed
in closed form. Instead, I'll compare this integral to an integral
which I can show converges.
Since the limits of integration are 1 to
,
, and therefore
.
So
(I did the integral using the substitution
.)
converges, and it is
larger than the original integral. Therefore,
converges.
You can see why this works geometrically by considering the picture
above.
represents the
area under
from 1 to
. The computation I
did shows that this area is finite --- in fact, it's
.
represents the area
under
from 1 to
. This area is less than the area
under
. Since the area under
is finite, the area under
must be
finite as well.
Send comments about this page to: bikenaga@marauder.millersville.edu.
Last updated: December 2, 2005
Millersville University Home Page
Copyright 2005 by Bruce Ikenaga