If u and v are functions of x, the Product Rule says that
Integrate both sides:
This is the integration by parts formula. The
integral on the left corresponds to the integral you're trying to do.
Parts replaces it with some junk (
) and another integral (
). You'll make progress if the new integral is easier
to do than the old one.
I'm going to set up parts computations using tables; it is
much easier to do repeated parts computations this way than
to use the standard u-
approach. To see where the table comes
from, start with the parts equation:
Apply parts to the integral on the right, differentiating
and integrating v. This gives
If I apply parts yet again to the new integral on the right, I would get
There's a pattern here, and it's captured by the following table:
To make the table, put alternating +'s and -'s in the left-hand
column. Take the original integral and break it into a u (second
column) and a
(third column). (I'll discuss how you choose u and
later.) Differentiate repeatedly down the u-column, and integrate
repeatedly down the
-column. (You don't write down the
;
it's kind of implicitly there in the third column, since you're
integrating.)
How do you get from the table to the messy equation above? Consider
the first term on the right:
. You get that from the table by
taking the + sign, taking the u next to it, and then moving
"southeast" to grab the v.
If you compare the table with the equation, you'll see that you get the rest of the terms on the right side by multiplying terms in the table according to the same pattern:
The table continues downward indefinitely, so how do you stop? If you look at the last messy equation above and compare it to the table, you can see how to stop: Just integrate all the terms the last row of the table.
You'll see that in many examples, the process will stop naturally when the derivative column entries become 0.
Example. Compute
.
Parts is often useful when you have different kinds of functions
in the same integral. Here I have a power (
)
and and exponential (
), and this suggests using parts.
I have to "allocate"
between u and
---
remember that
implicitly goes into
. I will use
and
. Here's the parts table:
You can see the derivatives of
in one column and the integrals of
in another. Notice that when I get a 0, I cut off the
computation.
Therefore,
But
is just 0 (up to an arbitrary constant), so
I can write
Before leaving this problem, it's worth thinking about why the
went
into the derivative column and the
went into the
integral column. Here's what would happen if the two were reversed:
This is bad for two reasons. First, I'm not getting that nice 0 I got
by repeatedly differentiating
. Worse, the powers in the last
column are getting bigger! This means that the problem is getting
{\it more} complicated, rather than less.
Here's another attempt which doesn't work:
I got a 0 this time, but how can I find the integral in the second
row? --- it's the same as the original integral! Putting the
entire integrand into the integration column never works.
Here's a rule of thumb which reflects the preceding discussion. When you're trying to decide which part of an integral to put into the derivative column, the order of preference is roughly
L-I-P-T-E.
According to this rule, in
you'd try the log
in the derivative column ahead of the power
x.
And in
you'd try the trig function
in the derivative column, because
it has precedence over the exponential
.
Example. Compute
.
Example. Compute
.
Example. Compute
.
First,
The same substitution shows that
Now do the original integral by parts:
Example. Compute
.
Parts is also useful when the integrand is a single, unsimplifiable
lump. You can't do anything interesting with
, so use parts.
Therefore,
I can do the new integral by substituting
. Then
, so
:
Example. Compute
.
If you do a definite integral using parts, compute the antiderivative using parts as usual, then slap on the limits of integration at the end.
Thus,
Example. Compute
.
What's this? All that work and you get the original integral again!
Actually, you're almost done. Jog your brain and get out of "parts mode". Instead, look at the equation as an equation to be solved for the original integral. It looks like this:
Just move the copy of the original integral on the right back to the left!
Send comments about this page to: bikenaga@marauder.millersville.edu.
Last updated: January 22, 2006
Millersville University Home Page
Copyright 2005 by Bruce Ikenaga