If you graph
and
, you see that the graphs become
almost indistinguishable near
:
That is, as
,
. This approximation is
often used in applications --- e.g. analyzing the motion of a simple
pendulum for small displacements. I'll use it later on to derive the
formulas for differentiating trig functions.
In terms of limits, this approximation says
(Notice that plugging in
gives
.) A
derivation requires the Sandwich Theorem and a little geometry. What
I'll give is not really a proof from first principles; you can think
of it as an argument which makes the result plausible.
I've drawn a sector subtending an angle
inside a circle of
radius 1. (I'm using
instead of x, since
is more often used for the central angle.) The inner right triangle
has altitude
, while the outer right triangle has
altitude
. The length of an arc of radius 1 and
angle
is just
.
(I've drawn the picture as if
is nonnegative. A similar argument
may be given if
.)
Clearly,
Divide through by
:
As
,
--- just plug in.
By the Sandwich Theorem,
Taking reciprocals, I get
Example. Compute
.
Plugging in
gives
. I have to do some more work.
The limit formula looks like this:
(I'm using
instead of x to avoid confusing the
variable in the formula with the variable in the problem.) The
point is that the thing that is going to 0, the thing inside the
sine, and the thing on the bottom must be identical.
In this problem, there is a
inside the sine, but an x on the
bottom. One or the other must change to match. I don't have nice ways
of altering things inside a sine, but making the bottom into
is
easy:
Let
. As
,
. So
Example. Compute
.
Plugging in gives
.
The idea here is to create terms of the form
, to which I can apply my limit rule.
As
,
by
the sine limit formula.
, since
and
is continuous.
Example. Compute
.
Plugging in gives
. The limit may or may not exist.
Force the
form to appear by using the trig identity
:
Example. Compute
.
If you draw the graph near
with a graphing calculator or a
computer, you are likely to get unusual results. Here's the picture
produced by Mathematica:
The problem is that when x is close to 0, both
and
are very close to 0 --- producing overflow
and underflow.
Actually, the limit is easy: Let
. When
,
, so
For the last step, I used the result from the previous problem.
Example. Compute
.
If you set
, you get
. Sigh.
I'll see what I can deduce by plotting the graph.
It looks as thought the limit is defined, and the picture suggests that it's around 3.5.
First, I'll break the tangents down into sines and cosines:
Next, I'll force the
form to appear.
Since I've got
and
, I need to make a
and
a
to match:
Now take the limit of each piece:
The limit of a product is the product of the limits:
It's easy to derive the formulas for differentiating sine and cosine from the limit formula
and the angle addition formulas. I'll work out the formula for sine by way of example.
Let
. Then
Now
Hence,
That is,
In similar fashion, you can derive the formula
Example.
Example. It's easy to derive the differentiation rules for the other trig functions from the ones for sine and cosine. Here are the formulas:
As an example, I'll derive the formula for cosecant. Remember that cosecant is the reciprocal of sine, so
Now you can use these formulas to compute derivatives involving these trig functions:
Example. For what values of x does
have a horizontal tangent?
So
where
. In the range
, this happens at
. So
for
, where n is any integer.
Send comments about this page to: bikenaga@marauder.millersville.edu.
Last updated: December 2, 2005
Millersville University Home Page
Copyright 2005 by Bruce Ikenaga