Definition. A number
is
perfect if
. Equivalently, n is perfect if it
is equal to the sum of its divisors other than itself.
Example. 6 is perfect, because
It is not known whether there are any odd perfect numbers, or whether there are infinitely many even perfect numbers. The existence of infinitely many even perfect numbers is related to the existence of infinitely many Mersenne primes by the following result.
Proposition. n is an even perfect number if
and only if
, where
is a Mersenne
prime.
Proof. First, suppose
is prime. Then
is even; I want to show that it's
perfect. Since
is an odd prime, it is relatively prime to
. Hence,
Therefore, n is perfect.
Conversely, suppose n is an even perfect number. I want to show
, where
is a Mersenne prime.
Since n is even, I can write
, where
and m is odd. Then
Since
divides the left side, it divides the right side. But
is odd, so I must have
.
I claim further that
is the highest power of 2
which divides
. For if
,
then
Hence,
, which contradicts
the fact that m is odd.
Since I now know that
is the highest power of 2
which divides
, I can write
,
where s is odd. Then
Hence,
If I can show
, then I will have gotten n to have the
right form.
To do this, start with
. Add s to both sides to
get
m is divisible by 1, by itself, and by s (because
). If
, then
This implies
, which is a contradiction. So
. If in addition
, then 1, s, and m are three
distinct divisors of m, so
This contradicts
, derived above. Therefore,
.
At this point, I know
. I only need to show that
is prime. Since 1 and
are distinct
factors of
, I have
Therefore,
. But this means that 1
and
are the only factors of
, i.e.
is prime.
Example.
is prime, so
is perfect.
I now know that finding even perfect numbers is equivalent to finding
Mersenne primes --- primes of the form
. I showed earlier
that
is prime implies that n is prime. So to look for
Mersenne primes, I only need to look at
for n prime. Next,
I'll derive a result which simplifies checking that
is prime. First, here's an amusing lemma.
Lemma.
.
Proof. Assume without loss of generality
that
. The greatest common divisor of two numbers doesn't
change if I subtract the smaller from the larger, so
Since
is odd, it has no factors in common with the
in
the first term. So
Now I see that the "
" in each slot is just
along for the ride: All the action is taking place in the exponents.
And what is happening is that the subtraction algorithm for computing
greatest common divisors is operating in the exponents! --- the
original pair a, b, was replaced by
, b.
It follows that the exponents will "converge" to
, because this is what the subtraction algorithm does. And when the
algorithm terminates, I'll have
, proving the result.
Example.
, so
This is surely not obvious, especially when you consider that
and
!
Theorem. Let p be an odd prime. Every factor
of
has the form
for some
.
Proof. It suffices to prove that the result
holds for prime factors of
. For
so products of numbers of the form
also have that form.
Suppose then that q is a prime factor of
. Little Fermat
says
. The preceding lemma implies that
Now
and
implies
. In particular,
,
since it's divisible by the prime q. This in turn implies that
. Now p is prime, so this is only possible if
. In particular,
.
Write
, so
. q is odd, so
is even, and
is even. Since p is odd, t must be even:
for some k. Then
, which is what I wanted to
show.
Example. Is
prime?
. If
has a proper
prime factor, it must have one less than 362, and the prime factor
must have the form
. So I need to check
the primes less than 362 to see if they divide 131071.
Therefore,
is prime.
Send comments about this page to: bikenaga@marauder.millersville.edu.
Last updated:
Millersville University Home Page
Copyright 2007 by Bruce Ikenaga